Wednesday, March 22, 2023

IGES

  • Our Story
    • About Us
    • Mission and Vision
  • Geopolitics
  • Economy
  • Security
  • Press Service
  • Contact
  • Bosanski
No Result
View All Result
IGES
No Result
View All Result

IGES

No Result
View All Result
Home Geopolitics

Geopolitical significance of Kashmir

The conflict over Kashmir between Pakistan and India was waged in three wars and began in 1947. Both countries felt that the territory belonged to them completely.

Mirela Imširović Mirela Imširović


February 10, 2021
in Geopolitics
Geopolitical significance of Kashmir

The conflict between the two countries mainly causes the involvement of other countries, both to resolve and suppress the conflict, and for their interests. War is the most primitive form of conflict resolution. However, there are geopolitical points in the world that, due to their strategic value, are an important aspect of the relationship between states and continents, so military conflicts are difficult to avoid. Political conflicts, which often result in wars, primarily disrupt domestic and world security, and consequently endanger the health of the population, destroy the economy, education, energy security and create an impossible flow of food to populations. Every war in the world is especially felt in developing countries. If the conflicting countries are also nuclear powers, then they automatically become the main topic of the international community. One of the most important geopolitical points with strategic value in the world is the wider area of ​​Kashmir, which is located between the three nuclear powers of India, Pakistan, and China. Kashmir also borders Afghanistan, which is located at the crossroads connecting South and Central Asia, while Central Asia is itself a geographical bridge between Europe and other parts of Asia.

Copyright Tribune.com.pk

That is why Kashmir has a unique geopolitical status. Additional importance to this region is given by the access of Pakistan and India to the Arabian Sea, which gives them a direct connection with the maritime corridors and the Persian Gulf itself. We should not forget the fact that today unhindered traffic both by land and sea is just as valuable as the goods and services themselves that are transported through these corridors. The accelerated process of globalization has changed a lot and thus increased the value of sea and land routes. The traffic enables the circulation of money and the corridors’ unhindered flow. That is why the great geopolitical feature today is precisely transport, within which the transport of oil and water, as energy drivers of the present and the future, are at the very top. The territory is valuable, along with oil and water, as much as it is connected to the rest of the world. Considering all the above, Kashmir is a vital component of China’s national interests, especially because of the Belt and Road Initiative and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

The conflict over Kashmir between Pakistan and India was waged in three wars and began in 1947. Both countries felt that the territory belonged to them completely. The Indo-Pakistani war ended with an UN-mediated ceasefire that set up its forces in an Interzone called the Line of Surveillance. After further fighting in the wars of 1965 and 1971, the Simla Agreement formally established a line of control between the territories under the control of the two nations. In 1999, an armed conflict between the two countries broke out again in Kargil, which did not change the situation on the ground. It is important to note that Pakistan became a nuclear power in 1994, so this fact also brought balance to the relations between the two countries.

India without Kashmir would not have such a significant position on the map of Central Asia, in that case, it would not have a connection to land trade routes. Control of the area provides a valuable advantage in positioning all sides, where we should not forget the proximity of Tajikistan, which still has strong ties with Russia. On the other hand, Pakistan’s economy is integrated into world trade with strong trade ties with the European Union, but also with Asia. Pakistan has a very important strategic position given that it is on the way of the main maritime and land transport connections going from Central Asia and the Middle East to the center of South and East Asia. Stretching along with the Silk Road (Belt and Road Initiative) as well as the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), they make this country an even more significant crossroads. Pakistan has developed very close diplomatic relations not only with the People’s Republic of China but also with Turkey and the Arab states. Relations with the United States are volatile due to differences in interests during the Cold War and the war on terror.

Although India is much larger than its northern neighbor, it still has a less favorable geographical position in the context of China’s new land transport infrastructure investment plans. That is why India is trying to connect with the trade route through Afghanistan, which leads through Central Asia to Russia and Europe. India sells a good part of its goods to world markets via the Arabian Sea and Iranian ports. Through Kashmir, India would have direct access to the same land routes that Pakistan has. In their endeavors better positioned in the region and on the global stage, India has the support of Japan, Singapore, Sri Lanka, France, Bhutan, Australia, Afghanistan, Canada, North Korea, and the United Kingdom.

Based on all given, it is clear why the security of Kashmir is important for the national interests of both Pakistan and India. Although not a direct participant in the conflict in the region, China is very interested in stability in that part of the world. A strong and developed economy of any country, especially of populous countries like these three, is not possible without secure transport corridors through which goods, capital, and people pass. All countries around Kashmir are very aware of that, and in principle, none of them is interested in a conflict, but also in deviating from the territory. The question of how to achieve the rule of law and lasting peace and stability on this piece of land remains unanswered.

Although Bosnia and Herzegovina have no direct contact with this region, it should still closely monitor all events in the world, because accelerated globalization leaves no one behind, including our country. Lessons can be learned from the political conflicts in Kashmir for our region, which is also one of the most sensitive security zones on the planet. As a participant in international relations, our country should, in its capacities, participate in every field, political, economic, cultural, etc. As an independent state and political factor, Bosnia and Herzegovina should get rid of the practice of conducting diplomacy emotionally and identifying with other religious and ethnic grounds. This is true for all three peoples in our country, who inflict the greatest damage with such policies on Bosnia and Herzegovina and all its inhabitants. The establishment of an efficient economy will not be possible without political awareness and communication with the world through developed and professional diplomacy. Kashmir can only be an example of how the great powers are positioned in one area, where the highest price is paid by the people of Kashmir. In this sense, the Balkans, and especially Bosnia and Herzegovina, cannot solve their problems outside the European Union and NATO, so this should be clear to all participants in regional policy. The free flow of people, goods, and capital, and thus the rise of local economies, would be accelerated by entering under one security cloak, which is certainly unavoidable.

Share296Tweet185Share52SendSendScan
Previous Post

Mackinder: Who rules Eastern Europe rules the World

Next Post

Energy security in the era of hybrid warfare

What is published on the IGES website does not necessarily represent the official position of IGES.

Mirela Imširović

Mirela Imširović

Mirela Imširović is a PhD candidate at the Faculty of Political Science in Sarajevo at the Department of Security and Peace Studies, and a PhD candidate in international relations at the School of Politics and International Studies at Wuhan University in China. She holds a master's degree in international relations from the Chinese University of Foreign Affairs in Beijing, as well as Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian language and literature from BiH at the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo. She was hired at the Council of Europe in Strasbourg as a consultant on projects of development of democratic culture in education systems. He has extensive international experience in the field of geopolitics, international relations and the development and improvement of teaching. She is a member of the Institute for Geopolitics, Economy and Security.

Geopolitics

Poricanje genocida u Srebrenici je očigledno i opasno
Geopolitics

Srebrenica Genocide Denial: A Clear and Present Danger

July 29, 2022
Why The Taliban’s Victory Represents A Victory For Long-Term US Geopolitical Interests
Geopolitics

Why The Taliban’s Victory Represents A Victory For Long-Term US Geopolitical Interests

August 23, 2021
Viktor Orban: Serbia is a key country for the European Union?!
Geopolitics

Viktor Orban: Serbia is a key country for the European Union?!

September 30, 2021

Economy

Drones – The “Space Race” of Our Time
Economy

Drones – The “Space Race” of Our Time

April 22, 2021
What Is behind the Recent Rise in Global Food Prices?
Economy

What Is behind the Recent Rise in Global Food Prices?

August 9, 2021
European Union-China trade relations: Economic institutions in the theory of international relations
Economy

European Union-China trade relations: Economic institutions in the theory of international relations

March 12, 2021

Security

The legal aspect of military power imbalance in the Balkans
Security

The legal aspect of military power imbalance in the Balkans

February 7, 2022
Global arms industry: Sales by the top 25 companies up 8.5 per cent; Big players active in Global South
Security

Global arms industry: Sales by the top 25 companies up 8.5 per cent; Big players active in Global South

March 25, 2021
Disinformation in the Western Balkans
Security

Disinformation in the Western Balkans

March 7, 2021

The Institute for Geopolitics, Economy and Security (IGES), through its activities, research and analysis, monitors all aspects of geopolitical changes in the world, especially those that affect the stability and economic prosperity of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

info@iges.ba

  • Geopolitics
  • Economy
  • Security

© 2023 IGES - Institutes for Geopolitics, Economy and Security. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Our Story
    • About Us
    • Mission and Vision
  • Geopolitics
  • Economy
  • Security
  • Press Service
  • Contact
  • Bosanski

© 2023 IGES - Institutes for Geopolitics, Economy and Security. All Rights Reserved.

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used.